You are viewing [info]fin_al_xy_blunt's journal


My BDD & itchy remnants was somewhat back today. I tweeted 24 or was it 48 hours before (life'a Blur ain't it) that compliments are hard, so much weight of expectations to sustain & continue (CAN ONLY GO DOWN). Criticisms easier to take on board, no one expects anything - plenty of scope/room to improve (CAN ONLY GO UP). I found a nice hairstyle by accident this morning, wore nice clothes to my hearing (yay Julie, no more ITO!!) & saw myself nice, albeit in a rush (NO time to sink in & assess I'm ok looking, maybe even good) to get on time for the 11am hearing. Maybe (after the 11am hearing & for lunch) I ate too much KFC, Pepsi & Hanaichi - & pressure to keep that earlier attained good looks (avoiding mirrors cos I didn't wanna see a bad reflection that may compel me to look in the mirror more, fix my hair in vain or whatever dinosaur OCD ritual that I wanted to dig up). At the bus stop, on the way home, ran into minutely/briefly an old TAFE classmate from 2009. My BDD went into overdirve subconsciously, on the bus trip soon after consciously when seeing X's face/hair style/clothes etc. This type of behaviour happened a lot in Sydney. I'm not used to wearing semi-formal clothes any more, & like http://fin-al-xy-blunt.livejournal.com/2008/05/07/ LJ entry, they probably squeeze/put pressure on my body, causing unease & feelings of inadequacy - that literally are like a prolonged rush of blood to the head (any anatomists can verify that?!?). So sorry X from TAFE for not speaking to you, you know how much antipathy I have built as to a now unpenetrable wall AGAINST social networks & the social scene (bar a few contacts on Twitter that are very active & mention me offhand sometimes - only because they have many followers & get energy from many other friendly close interactions - that I don't have & at the moment don't $adly want or need). Hasta la vista Myer, David Jones clothes! Rock on Lowes, Target, Kmart, BigW. Go Gillard class warfare FTW ALP!!!!!
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share
  • Link

I'm lost for words...

  • May. 7th, 2012 at 6:44 PM

OK, so this practice, the most common of all harassment techniques (except maybe for tampering with mail and personal items, aircraft swoops and emergency vehicle “appearances”) involves the satellite/computer collection and dissemination of surveillance results and the “feeding back” of these results through media scripts.

For example, on a given morning a victim might say “I’ve had a gutful of corrupt governments”, he may play golf, he may make his car repayment etc etc. Later that day he tunes into his favorite news program or reads his favorite afternoon newspaper etc only to find a clear focus on stories involving the very things he said (out of context).

As the days, weeks, months roll by the coincidences multiply and the situation is repeated through ads, comedy, songs etc etc each and every day (incessantly) sometimes for decades. The intention is to criminally harass the victim in the hope that they go mad, bad etc as they’re surrounded by coincidences.

If they complain to friends, family, authorities they can appear paranoid and be discredited (like the spreading of false rumours and the encouraging of personal ridicule, spies fuel this process by setting it all up to distance victims from any possible source of help). 

http://www.surveillanceissues.com/

07 December 2011 by Allen Frances / Magazine issue 2842. Subscribe and save / For similar stories, visit the Books and Art Topic Guide
Book information / American Madness: The rise and fall of dementia praecox by Richard Noll / Published by: Harvard University Press / Price: £33.95/$45 / Richard Noll's American Madness: The rise and fall of dementia praecox is the history of the old name for schizophrenia, showing the problems with such labels

"WE DON'T see things as they are, we see things as we are." This simple Talmudic saying summarises the essence of epistemology. Psychiatric disorders provide a striking example: they are not real things in nature, but labels we create to describe troubling aspects of human experience.

Sometimes labels take on a life of their own. People mistakenly think that naming a psychiatric problem shapes it into a simple disease with a reductionist, biological explanation. Labelling mental disorders is useful in providing a common language and guide to treatment. But psychiatric disorders are remarkably heterogeneous and overlapping in their presentations and complex in their causation. The human brain rarely reveals its secrets in simple answers.

All of which brings us to the wonderful book, American Madness, an artful analysis of the rise and fall of the label "dementia praecox" from its promising birth in 1896 to its unlamented death in 1927. Introduced by the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin, the term was used to describe an early onset of psychotic symptoms that presaged a tragic downhill course and poor outcome - as distinct from manic depressive illness, which has a more variable age of onset, cyclical course, and greater chance for a good outcome.

The label dementia praecox spread like wildfire and was briefly the darling of psychiatry until it lost out to schizophrenia, a broader concept that included milder and earlier cases and did not necessarily imply such a bleak future or bad outcome. The defeat of one term and rise of the next resulted from a shift in diagnostic fashion promoted by leading American psychiatrists, dutifully followed by their flocks.

In retrospect, there was nothing inherently superior about either term. Schizophrenia won because it was less discouraging, implied therapy might help, was not of German origin when the US was at war with Germany and was of Swiss origin at a time when the two major figures in American psychiatry were Swiss immigrants. If it sounds arbitrary, it was. Human nature doesn't sort into neat and obvious categories.

The label schizophrenia is still with us, but hopefully not for too much longer. It is a tired, old concept that has outlived much of its usefulness. There is not one schizophrenia: more likely a hundred causes will gradually be teased out as research goes beyond description and discovers fundamental explanations.

Though set in the past, the lessons of this book are as fresh as the controversies over the new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5) and the very future of psychiatry. Like all of medicine, the history of psychiatry is a tale of faddish and false (but often temporarily useful) diagnostic theories and labels. Tracing the fate of dementia praecox provides historical perspective and keeps us on our epistemological toes. Today's psychiatric labels will one day seem just as quaint. We need them in our clinical work and research, but shouldn't be overly impressed with their explanatory value. And we should be on guard against making arbitrary changes based on frills and fashions.

Thus informed, perhaps we can avoid repeating the recursive ebbs and flows and instead achieve a rounded view of psychiatry.

Allen Frances was chair of the DSM 4 Task Force and is emeritus professor of psychiatry at Duke University

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228425.800-why-psychiatrists-should-mind-their-language.html
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share
  • Link

Note to self on the aftermath...

  • May. 4th, 2012 at 5:14 PM

Your massive Facebook FRIENDS LIST scares the bejesus out of me. Hence, I'll gladly safely settle for a hermit's existence. CULL CULL CULL!

Dr Andrea Walker bases her whole assessment that I'll become psychotic & cause harm to my family members based on: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QMHC/2010/ I repeat & repeat I have never been a criminal, & never will be. My violence I showed in one off incidents in 2005, 2006 & 2009, footballers do much worse week in, week out year after year ad infinitum. QLD is a very conservative state. I was stable in NSW because they don't willy nilly impose ITOs or ship me off to hospital. I had a weekly support group FUNDED by NSW Health...that SERIOUSLY helped me stay out of ITOs, hospitalisation, loneliness & trouble. No such offering is offered here in this bloody state.


I should have heeded my last case manager in Sydney, a Cath Pace, warning me to stay in Sydney. Soon after relocating in Brisbane Jan 2005, a support group member/maybe friend (I'm neurotic on the meaning of that blasted word) who helped me/drove me to Woolworths & texted me a few times - committed suicide. Later, my favourite band Crowded House, their drummer Paul Hester killed himself. That, on top of the large phone sex bills - is the unofficial story & CAUSE behind my 2005 DVO, ITO & hospitalisation. The official story is I NEVER felt that isolated in Sydney, if at all - less clinically. 


I am upset at my social isolation. I don't care anymore if Bruce Owens was too stingy to allow me & my former psychologist Corinne Le Patourel to drive to Nundah House for rehab in late 2011. The clinical report has one thing right. I am VERY upset with the social setup of society at large. Being on an ITO will inflame that. Please do all you can Julie to get me of this ITO. I've given up on the internet to provide me any, or some social comfort. I've poured out my brains, heart & soul for minuscule feedback. 


Maybe everyone's jealous of my intelligence...in the end I don't give a rat's race a$$. All I know is my status will freeze to minus par Antarctica levels being on this ITO. Yesterday at Woolworths - Dr Walker's damning crucifying words that I'm thought thought disordered played on my mind. If I wasn't on my game, I would've fallen apart. That proves I am strong & NOT mentally feeble. But if they keep on pre-empting my future with alarmist slander (hey maybe my treating team watches too much Law & Order, CSI blah blah blah), they'll eventually win. 


My mum is already indoctrinated & poisoned with status seeking, attainment & consolidation. Hence any slight progress I made is negated with the high $ick $tandards of $ociety - transmuted to my mum's sporadic & damaging outburst at me for my lack of $tatus. I'd prefer I cop her anger daily, rather than yesterday - a fortnight of peace, then one explosive VERBAL confrontation that was so destabilising as I gradually clawed & forged my hopes things we're getting better, plans to go back to TAFE etc. She later fought my sisters, so I didn't feel as bad & actually supported her later late last night. So the tables can turn easily in life. 


I'm pushing to get off this ITO, with or without some mild scene of emotion or theatrics at the actual hearing. I have a doctor's appointment with Dr Sehgal next Thursday, I'll practice some animosity there...it's about time, I have to step out of my cowardly goody goody two shoes at some point Right?

  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share
  • Link

25 minutes 28 seconds.
STEPHEN C. MYER: When I was at Cambridge one of my supervisors often advised us to, ah; ''beware the sound of one hand clapping''...which was a way of saying if there's an argument on one side, there's bound to be an argument on the other. & what I found in studying the structure of the argument in The Origin Of The Species is that for every evidence based argument for one of Darwin's two-key propositions, there is an evidence based counter-argument.

BEN STEIN: Well, but is there a debate? There's just you & a couple of other guys in a dinky loft, stepped down - staying on one side. There's all the faculties of the great universities of the world on the other side.

STEPHEN C. MYER: Speaking with a uniform & great authoritative voice. 

BEN STEIN: Well, yeah.

STEPHEN C. MYER: Well, in any case the debate isn't gonna be settled by the numbers - it's gonna be settled by the evidence & arguments.
26 minutes 11 seconds.
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share
  • Link

Kirsten Dunst how do you see the character you played in Justine?

Justine was a very sensitive creative human being that felt things maybe sometimes more than other people. & to me her relationship with the planet turns into almost her being a representation of the planet towards the end. & so it almost feels like she has some kind of psychic relationship in the beginning of the film. But I would $ay that sometimes the world is too much for her.
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share
  • Link

106 minutes 40 seconds.
BEN STEIN:
 So what is this?

UTA GEORGE: This is the dissection table?

BEN STEIN: Do you ever think to yourself the sane ones were the ones lying here having their brains removed. The insane ones was Dr Gorgas & all the other people that...

UTA GEORGE: No, no...I don't think that because I think, um, those people who killed here here were very sane cos they had their purposes.

BEN STEIN: They had purposes?

UTA GEORGE: Yes, I don't think they were insane...
107 minutes 04 seconds.
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share
  • Link

Everyone away, pretending life...(TF)

  • Apr. 19th, 2012 at 11:01 PM

Good evening Julie,

Thank you. I feel confident we'll have a better shot at winning, thanks to this draft submission you wrote!

Thank you for realising & researching I was 'voluntary' in Sydney for 10 years, never admitted to hospital too & compliant with medication/treatment setups. I was on a high dose of oral medication Risperdal back then, & I have photos that prove I put on HEAPS of weight (which led to my mum supporting me to get off them & just stay on Prozac when relocating to Brisbane in 2005). You might remember I said that to you in our last meeting at your office. If I can, I'll scan you some pics of me with a 2004 date stamp - but no promises.

You wrote on page 2, background 12: Jose has future plans to go back to TAFE in 2013 and complete his certificates. Clinical report wrote on page 4: Client remains as a socially isolated individual, living within a supportive but emotionally volatile family, and communicating with acquaintances via the internet. 

Perhaps if you like Julie you could edit it with this added new information: I actually am considering doing a light easier load of a subject (x1/only one) at TAFE for Semester 2, 2012 from a new found & increasing, albeit slow arising, recent stability in my family & household. Today was an example, when my mum picked me up after I walked to the shops. Also my foothold at home, if it wasn't entrenched already, seems to be firming. My mum has had no work this week from her nursing agency & she was asking for me to transfer some money as a result. Over the past 16 months, I've assisted her with $15,000 - the most recent payment being $4000 a month ago. Yes, elements of volatility still exist, but these are largely contained/suppressed/muffled & lessening in lengthy minus intensity. Yes, my dad will come back in July 2012...but I'm subtly coaxing my mum's long held idea & actual seeking/research of getting him a real estate property somewhere else. In effect, this will lead (if it hasn't already) to less conflict & maintaining the peaceful stability at home.

Now for some concerns or minor negatives. Your draft gave me the best chance for getting off the ITO, which is ultimately what I want. But in terms of ''pushing the envelope'' or stroking a stylistic agenda (at times, or when I'm relapsing - ''a vendetta'')...you've abandoned that (probably for my own good? IDK). To me that means I may be compelled to subdue a true chunk of my outlandish character, flair, fire & belief at the May 14, 2012 MHRT hearing. For professionals there's no ''us against them''. My mum preaches this, since she's an RN telling me no one's against me -the health workers are there to help you. Even your phone call today & the bit about Dr Andrea Walker - I could detect my mum in you, or the ''professionals treating co-professional professionally'' culture.

But for me, I probably won't have the bravado to react consistently brave/with conviction to what I write online & I generally don't. Dr Walker's increase of my depo to 50mg is an example. I bluntly think this proves my point i.e. they (the system & the health industry) think I'm sick & needs further restrictions, ala the ITO. They always promise me, ''oh Jose wait another 6 months & we'll take you off the ITO''. That's my private thoughts and stance - I'm getting a raw deal. In person, at the hearing - I may/may not (latter more likely) say that due to being flattered with their time & attention. This HENCE ELIMINATES any ''on the spot'' animosity I may have had held (pent up & built up) in my memory banks.

Only tiny bits of my frustration ever surface in my real life interactions with CCMHC or Bruce Owens, more hints & specks. So again my angry phone call to CCMHC & their hiring of extra security is ULTRA disappointing. It would make me write another 1000 word rant/venting in disgust on their TOTAL ignorance (of my kind benevolent nature & history TOWARDS THEM), stupidity & paranoia in doing such a resource wasting act. But if ''worked up'' enough emotionally, I can bite verbally, with family loudly - for a minute or two only though. The dog metaphor my uncle used in Tagalog for normal people previously crazy, versus docile cats when they go through mental illness episodes - ala my uncle's wife, whom is my aunt & mum's sister.

In ''my world'' (& I'd love to have a pic of myself handy in 2004 to prove it cos no one took records of my weight in Canterbury, Sydney...OR if I can find it it amongst many family photo albums - which could be a bit of a task)  increasing my meds, or Risperdal consta depo to a dose perhaps similar (have to verify it with Bruce Owens or registrar Dr Atul Sehgal next Tuesday when I my next depo is due) to tablet 3mg-4mg Risperdone 2004 dosage levels - did NOT work. I put on MUCH weight, lost confidence, lacked character & cohesion online/offline. Logically that compelled me from taking and dismissing NEEDED anti-psychotics. I even develop an aversion to them - which lasted for some while up until 2009. I was reading & believing anti-psychiatry literature & Scientology then. More weight, more anxiety, more sweat, more BDD, more MI equals less ease, less stability, less family peace. But I didn't have the fire or ''frame of mind'' to tell that to Dr Andrea Walker two days ago on Tuesday 17 April 2012. I was probably too shocked & put off (in terms of deciding/confused on the ''right'' thing to say to get off the ITO or what she'd like me to say so she decides I'm not sick or in need of an ITO extension). I also forgot to express my disgust at her reasoning that I'll cause violence off my ITO, which you Julie addressed & countered well in your draft submission.

You did say I had close ties to my family in your draft, so you got me right there in light of Bruce Owen's repeated solution for me to move out. I guess this leads to my last point. Most of what I wrote wasn't included, & I presume this is our final draft submission before the hearing. I detect & have mainly felt you or a lot of others (even my 11 year old sisters) still see a lot of my ways, style & philosophies of thinking as ''paranoid''. *** I conclude, from all this ''precaution'' shown to me by you & many others, that in order to survive in today's fast paced world, you will have to possess ''that'' black & white thinking. Unfocused metaphysical shades of grey thoughts are not welcome in society now. I guess we don't live in Ancient Rome, Plato & Aristotle any more  despite I personally enjoying a lot of the fruits of other Modern people's labour: oh so pragmatic, practical, productive & far away from my la la land. *** I can pretty much accept that, cos that's how the MHRT & health system operates, plus thinks.

So that's my final proposition to you. The draft is goody/goody - but will the MHRT (which you told me have many hearings, like a factory procession, no background & history checks...for life is already too overloaded with real life commitments, responsibilities, rest, recreation, grooming & maintenance issues) see through what you respectfully wrote? Will they see a discrepancy in what I may or may not personally present in complexity to the MHRT, versus your simplified ''by the book'' submission? i.e. rebellious, eccentric, unconventional, outside the box & argumentative. Or will MHRT's fast paced busy schedule overlook these possible contradictions, dichotomies etc.?

Or will you Julie tame me & rehearse with me Jose in what to say to them? I don't like putting on acts (honesty is integrity for me). I guess that proves I may have a MI, because I don't know how I'll react on any given day in terms of being myself...versus complying or putting on some kind of toned-down ''what society expects'' display. I do want desperately to get off my ITO (my main modus operandi goal with you Julie), & I KNOW you can provide me the needed feedback on how I talk & compose myself, based on our past two meetings. Sadly I'm learning in life impressions are everything i.e. how others (& yourself) perceives you defines a lot of what constitutes success or failure. Good intentions are often over swept away and muddled by perception, stereotype (negative OR positive) & ''certain way'' mood of the person absorbing what I, or you communicate to them & others...done through by gauging facial gestures, eye contact, energy levels of all involved, temperament, concentration, chemistry - even choice of clothes, hairstyle et al.

I've read your draft once & I really like it, I am very proud of it. I'll read it again tomorrow, maybe print it out to see another angle on it. 

Contact me any time,
Jose

PS I feel I've built up a good rapport with you. I feel I can email you a lot, & be myself (expression in email/blogs especially +1, in person & phone I still need practice for I don't see a regular psychologist that I used to in Corinne Le Patourel, like I did 6 months - & the clincher: I have no friends or relatives/cousins any more whom I'm on ''speaking terms'' with in English)...not constrain myself. So I do hope you get that vibe xoxo! But to maximise our chances, I hope you forsake politeness, or fear of offending me & tell me what (if any) areas I can improve on so I can beat this ITO. But then again they do say negativity can stop people improving & fulfilling their potential Right?!?!. Your call...


Was in a black mood today. New Scientist planted that old seed & wound, that I inflame - even TAFE 2013 plans I seriously don't foresee will cure it...of articles about social networking, friendship in primates etc. The magazine explicitly expressed (from dedicated & specialised research) how 150 friends is the healthy figure (I only have 1) & having close contact/s can stave off emotional & physical ailments. Compound this with sister's friends (whom I initially blamed [but now feel neutral, perhaps a tinge positive even] yesterday for making 1 twin accidentally over charge my beloved HP laptop by 2-3 hours the day before) coming over today for a play day. Hence I felt hell lonely, unwanted and reeling from the big fight over my bordering/verging on OCD-like treatment of my HP laptop (this was cured by my above blog entry). 


To top it off, my other male 20yo+ cousin didn't reply to my Facebook message & links to text to voice software at all. I lent William a book on anatomy that whilst VERY GLAD it has a found a use (not wasted or rotting on a shelf) for his study to be an RN (registered nurse)...I'm disappointed and wounding he's too busy/snobby/unappreciative to even quickly reply thanks, or I'll message you a bit longer at a more convenient time (since William has exams). He and his sister (with two toddlers) came over Easter Sunday and we had a great time. I guess this proves there's 2 sides to most facets on life, & you'll seldom see all sides being simultaneously satisfied (Death Cab For Cutie 'I Will Follow You Into The Dark' semi-memory-reference there). Or is society really, definitely maybe NOT 'an angel at work, a bitch at home'? I know doubt, empirical scepticism & lack of faith in your fellow human beings' diary log recollection and scatter brain accounts of their personal VS work life...will now & forever put this question into hiatus limbo. Plus, so well known we deny or suppress into the back of our minds any negative events. So again, truth will unlikely see the light of day.

This leads me on to my main point. My other 20yo+ cousin I had my first online 'spit the dummy' fight with in 3 years. We've had periods of ignoring each other or neglecting, but this was the first fight in 3 years where I said words that RJ found directly & quickly offensive, so he reacted on his Windows Live MSN account about staying away from my negativity blah blah blah. Wow I never knew I inherited a patent on it, who put the devil in you or me (You Am I lyric). Yes, I was in a funny mood & was a tad harsh about RJ ignoring (like he does 9.5 times out of 10) my invite for him attend a small family get-together at the Bronco's Leagues Club on my mum's birthday. At least half the time he asks me to go out with him to the city, I shower & get ready ASAP like a puppy so he's not alone for his haircut or whatever. I've agreed twice the past months. All my invitations to RJ, or whatever requests...ZILCH. Has to be on his terms, not mine blah blah blah.

Maybe RJ & William's generation need to extricate themselves from their vast social network's 'hippy positive' lifestyle. I arguably came from a 'school of hard knocks', my history proves it near irrefutably conclusively. Most kids have a parent that drive as they grow up, I never got that till the last year of my high school (1996 - & even then I dropped out from BDD - a real medical condition like cancer you Doubting Thomas fuck shits). I could list a whole batch of reasons, but that's mundane & I've mentioned it all before, on this LJ blog a number of times. If you think a few ABERRANT RARE words of frustration (not even abuse & stalking in most [if not all] domains of critique) is a reason to ignore a family member, you must live in la la la land. Many times, my cousins have ignored my many chat messages or emails (classic example above with William), but I bloody well move on & don't take it too personally or bear grudges to warrant an Windows Live MSN profile update like RJ did. If you fucking think life is 'one big positive acid trip', I can't wait till your marriage hits the rocks. Let's see how your 'hippy ALL-positive Bible' will stand up or handle that!

I said on my twitter the status quo will stagnate & remain the same, despite all the heroic idealisms & musings of musicians/authors. I've had one cousin my age, ask a few piercing questions about my blog, Sydney Sixers personalised guernsey name & betting hobbies...& whilst I appreciate her attention, perhaps flattered - in the end I realise it's still a friendly 'cop-out'. There's no intensity, urgency and therapy to probe deeper, or to, as I wrote in my mentioned tweet 'to act out of reality' ever suffices and surfaces from most of my interactions with others in this wild wild world. As the latest New Scientist magazine issue said, we all probably have a heap of 'silent voyeurs' on our social networking lists and accounts. I'm glad I don't crave intimate online contacts any more (probably built a tolerance & resistance to it). I had a lot of that 'buddy-buddy' stuff (with both sexes) from 2006 to 2009, hell even my Whirlpool 'james.XY.blunt' forum addiction came out of a big personal space (or vacuum) of low self-esteem & need to prove myself, make a mark on the world. These days the world's alright, the sun shines bright - I'm kicking out the bad dreams (Bardot music lyric there there) & I grow from my gladly self-imposed solitude (call it what you want, aka isolation when feeling negative or DSMV). I develop amazing ways to cope, unique - all 'original thought' (Marliyn Davies TAFE 2009-2011 quote) that I could even maybe one day advise others, write a book on my personal predicament which will be inflicted on more & more.

  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share
  • Link

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow